February 4, 2010
Copyright madness infects Australia
The CNN writeup is more balanced, but the BBC's better highlights the outrageousness of the underlying issues:
The Australian band Men at Work are facing a big legal bill after a court ruled it had plagiarised a Girl Guides' song in its 1983 hit, Down Under."Stolen" and "plagiarized" clearly do not apply here. What has the world come to, when you are not allowed to make a quick bow to an iconic and now-traditional Australian melody in a song about being Australian? This was just a quick riff, an allusion and tribute of the sort that has enriched music since time immemorial. But now that tip of the hat is being repaid with lawsuits, leaving everyone the poorer.Larrikin Music had claimed the flute riff from was stolen from Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree, written by Marion Sinclair in 1934.
The federal court in Sydney ordered compensation to be paid.The decision is bad enough, but 60% would be an outrage. This isn't a case involving the central melody, or any lyrics.That amount has yet to be determined but Larrikin's lawyer said it could reach 60% of income from the song.
"It's a big win for the underdog," said Larrikin's lawyer Adam Simpson after the judgment.That's pretty rich.
Sinclair, who died in 1988, wrote the song for performance at a Girl Guides Jamboree in 1935.And American, as well. Wonder if they'll be trying to collect royalties from the kids next.Kookaburra Sits in the Old Gum Tree has since been sung by generations of Australian schoolchildren.
Posted by David on February 4, 2010 9:13 AM
According to Snopes, Happy Birthday is also still in active copyright and should not be sung in public venues without paying royalties...
Copyright should expire when something has moved into the public domain as clearly and as long ago as these things have...20 years or the artist's lifetime ought to be enough.
Posted by: Doug in Colorado on February 4, 2010 6:17 PM
The principle that rights to a word can be lost if that word becomes a generic term should also apply to music. When a word or a song becomes so woven into the fabric of everyday life, it's simply absurd to treat it as private property.
Posted by: David on February 4, 2010 10:26 PM
Yes,I agree,it's an example of the expensive hair- splitting at which lawyers are skilled(they're certainly not poorer) however,it has no place in an artistic context.Unfortunately music is big business.
Posted by: Russell W on February 5, 2010 4:08 PM
And there's a brief, hilarious rendition of "Kookaburra" in "The Young Visiters" - I wonder what the producers had to pay for that.
Posted by: Allan Janus on February 16, 2010 2:40 PM