November 24, 2008

Relic of the Buddha

Chinese archaeologists have claimed that a 1,000-year-old miniature pagoda, unearthed in Nanjing, holds a piece of skull belonging to Siddhartha Gautama, the founder of Buddhism. . .

The pagoda was wedged tightly inside an iron case that was discovered at the site of a former temple in the city in August.

The four-storey pagoda, which is almost four feet high and one-and-a-half feet wide, is thought by archaeologists to be one of the 84,000 pagodas commissioned by Ashoka the Great in the second century BC to house the remains of the Buddha.

From the Telegraph. Oddly enough, the evident influence of various Buddhist practices upon early Christianity remains profoundly underappreciated, even among specialists in the period. This article is a reminder that the Christian cult of relics must have come from somewhere -- that "somewhere" most likely being Buddhism.

Posted by David on November 24, 2008 10:17 PM

Comments

"This article is a reminder that the Christian cult of relics must have come from somewhere -- that "somewhere" most likely being Buddhism."

Actually? Not! Lional Casson's book "Travel in the Ancient World" makes pretty explicit that the Relics Racket that Catholicism engaged in was well established in Hellenic and Roman times and is traceable back to Sumer long before Buddhism existed. When you stop and think about it the number of things that people associate with the Medieval period that they in fact merely inherited from Classical times is too often underestimated. @_@

Posted by: Small Pink Mouse on November 26, 2008 4:20 AM

I haven't the time at the moment for a full response, but the early Christian cult of relics *was* a sharp departure from contemporary Roman and Greek practice -- veneration of tombs of certain ancient heros notwithstanding. Pre-Christian cults of the dead were one thing -- promptly dismembering and dispersing the remains of saints and martyrs, quite another.

I confess to not having read Casson's book, but I have spent quite a few years working my way through the very substantial specialist literature regarding the Christian cult of relics and its origins. Even fine historians may slip up when working outside their main areas of expertise. From what I can glean from the pages of Casson's volume visible through Google Books, the book is hardly intended for a scholarly audience, lacking any notes. Nor is it even very up-to-date, having been published in 1974 and only slightly updated 20 years later. That said, I still cannot find any part of it that appears online that describes anything like a pre-Christian Christian-style cult of relics.

Posted by: David on November 26, 2008 4:10 PM
Post a comment




  Remember Me?


(For bold text to display correctly, please use <strong>, not <b>)




Google