May 8, 2008

Spain vs Odyssey Marine

Spain demanded the return of sunken treasure worth an estimated half a billion dollars yesterday, accusing Odyssey, the deep-sea exploration company that discovered it, of looting its shipwrecks.

Spanish archaeologists said that they had determined "with complete certainty" that the record haul had come from the Spanish colonial-era galleon Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes, sunk by a British fleet off the southern coast of Portugal in 1804. . .

Mark Pizzo, a US judge, ruled against Odyssey last month, ordering it to share information about the find with the Spanish. Yesterday Spain said that coins from the haul were documented to have been on the Mercedes, while the location of the find also indicated that it came from the galleon.

"The sinking of the Mercedes was a pivotal event in Spanish and European history, and the site and its contents are the inalienable historical heritage and patrimony of Spain," the Government said in court papers due to be filed today as part of a continuing trial to determine who owns the treasure. It added that it never authorised Odyssey to disturb the "gravesite of hundreds of Spanish sailors and their family members" who died when the ship sank.

From the Times of London.

Posted by David on May 8, 2008 10:21 PM

Comments

Spain's greedy.

Posted by: Rob on May 9, 2008 2:12 PM

"The sinking of the Mercedes was a pivotal event in Spanish and European history, and the site and its contents are the inalienable historical heritage and patrimony of Spain"

Best not push that line too much. The gold and silver were formerly hitorical heritage items stolen from New World during a pivotal event in, for example, Incan and Aztec empires, so should be repatriated, yes?

And the wreck is not in Spanish waters. It is "off Portugal." And respect for the dead, sure (up to a point), but is there any evidence of disrespect?

Spain may have some grounds for trying to get a piece of the action, but this just sounds like a silly two-year-old shouting "MINE!"

Posted by: teqjack on May 9, 2008 2:32 PM

This is another fascinating example of salvage claims vs national claims. The complication of this discovery make it more interesting. The supposed "Spanish" treasure of course represents gold taken by conquest from the indeigenous peoples the Spanish encountered.Is it the theft or the minting of coins or both that gives Spain any claim. Do the present population of Mexico and elsewhere in Central America are not the same people who were conquered of course. Instead they are largely the result of several centuries of amalgamation of genes resulting in the current population as well as centuries of seeking self rule and not remaining royal colonies of Spain. Then too, are the risk takers who loacated the wreck and recovered the treasure not to be compensated? That would seem unjust and contrary to common sense. What is needed is a brokered settlemen that gives something to everyone with some kind of interest.

Posted by: Donald Wolberg on May 9, 2008 4:45 PM
Post a comment




  Remember Me?


(For bold text to display correctly, please use <strong>, not <b>)




Google