December 18, 2007
Always greener . . .
This isn't the first article touting diets then vs diets now. But enough already: do we really want to emulate a style of eating, drinking, and working that outdid the worst of present-day Africa in the nasty, short, and brutish department?
If they managed to survive plague and pestilence, medieval humans may have enjoyed healthier lifestyles than their descendants today, it has been claimed.Crucial concession follows:Their low-fat, vegetable-rich diet - washed down by weak ale - was far better for the heart than today's starchy, processed foods, one GP says.
"If you put this together with the incredible work load, medieval man was at much less risk of coronary heart disease and diabetes than we are today," said Dr Henderson.Yes, dying young is certainly one highly effective method of avoiding all the leading modern-day killers: heart disease; stroke; cancer; diabetes. No takers? From the BBC.However, he did acknowledge that people today did have one advantage over their ancestors when it came to staying alive.
"If you got to 30 in those days you were doing well, past 40 and you were distinctly long in the tooth," he concedes.
Posted by David on December 18, 2007 9:38 AM
I saw that one as well. I notice they don't point out that there are still plenty of places on earth today where you can experience medieval diet and life expectancy, yet few seem to want to flock to these dietary paradises.
Posted by: Brett on December 18, 2007 9:55 AM
As i recall there were many, many dietary deficiencies as well: lack of D, C, calcium, iron, etc., that resulted in a medly of ricketts, growth issues, loss of teeth, etc. Then too, the constant threat of infection, lack of adequate surgical conditions, childbirth problems for women, etc., all took an amazing toll. I recall 30 was a reasonable median age, but greater than 50% attrition in the first few years. The paleolithic folks may have had longer life spans because big game hunting and food gathering for plant materials, and the seasonal round moving so as not to badly contaminate a single area, was likely healthier. The mammoth and cave bear steaks nicely roasted likely tasted better. Since hardly anyone lived long enough to get those cardiac conditions that accumulate, or the increased risk over time for prostate or otehr cancers, or alzheimers, shortened lives were much healthier, one would think.
Posted by: Donald Wolberg on December 18, 2007 1:13 PM
File with "The operation was successful, but the patient died."
Posted by: teqjack on December 19, 2007 5:15 PM