September 18, 2007

How was the weather?

"Jan. 11 was so frightfully cold that all of the communion wine froze," says an entry from 1684 by Brother Josef Dietrich, governor and "weatherman" of the once-powerful Einsiedeln Monastery. "Since I've been an ordained priest, the sacrament has never frozen in the chalice."

"But on Jan. 13 it got even worse and one could say it has never been so cold in human memory," he adds.

Diaries of day-to-day weather details from the age before 19th-century standardized thermometers are proving of great value to scientists who study today's climate. Historical accounts were once largely ignored, as they were thought to be fraught with inaccuracy or were simply inaccessible or illegible. But the booming interest in climate change has transformed the study of ancient weather records from what was once a "wallflower science," says Christian Pfister, a climate historian at the University of Bern.

From Discovery News. Tracking climate change is of course the prime motivator here, but what is also interesting is the changing variability of the weather:
Brother Konrad Hinder, the current weatherman at Einsiedeln and an avid reader of Dietrich's diaries, says his predecessor's precise accounts of everything from yellow fog to avalanches provide historical context.

"We know from Josef Dietrich that the extremes were very big during his time. There were very cold winters and very mild winters, very wet summers and very dry summers," he says, adding that the range of weather extremes has been smaller in the 40 years he has recorded data for the Swiss national weather service.

Posted by David on September 18, 2007 10:45 AM

Comments

The non-metric but faithfully descriptive records do have a valuable seat at the conundrum that is the debate over climatic change. Time depth seems only to obscure the edges of the debat and highlights the confusion over "weather" and "climate." Also apparent is the need to undertsand that whatever the present "climate" may be, there is nothing that says that our modern "climate" is the ideal or norm for planet Earth. An observor in Manhattan 15,000 years ago would have the idea that ice sheets hundreds of feet thick, sea levels 300 feet lower (water was on land as ice)and mastodons were "ideal." A later ancient living 10,000 years ago, would have witnessed the mother of all climate change episodes as the Earth warmed and all that ice vanished and the sea rose 300 feet very, very rapidly. And there were no coal fired electric plants, automobiles or flatulent cattle--or for that matter political hot air.

Posted by: Donald Wolberg on September 19, 2007 8:19 AM
Post a comment




  Remember Me?


(For bold text to display correctly, please use <strong>, not <b>)




Google