November 26, 2006

British museums priced out

British museums are being priced out of the market when it comes to acquiring artwork, a survey has suggested.

Research conducted by a UK charity, the Art Fund, found New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art spent £53.5m buying new works in 2004 and 2005.

The city's MoMa gallery spent £20m. The Louvre in Paris allocated £16.8m.

But London's National Gallery only spent £6.3m. . .

The UK's four Tate Galleries spent a combined total of £4.8m in 2004 and 2005, while the British Museum spent £761,000.

From the BBC. The article notes the more liberal tax incentives offered in the USA for donations to museums; it does not mention, however, that the British museums are further hamstrung by their inability to deaccession artworks in order to pay for new acquisitions.

Posted by David on November 26, 2006 4:16 PM

Comments

So, if research suggests that even the ngreatest museums and galleries can no longer compete effectively for acquisitions, who is pricing them out of the market? The competition against each other, driving up the price? Or private investors, the uber classes, with more money than taste, who want to grab everything in sight and stash it away for their own private enjoyment, or more likely, for bragging rights.

Posted by: Sarah [TypeKey Profile Page] on November 26, 2006 11:06 PM
Post a comment




  Remember Me?


(For bold text to display correctly, please use <strong>, not <b>)




Google